Git packfiles use delta compression, storing only the diff when a 10MB file changes by one line, while the objects table stores each version in full. A file modified 100 times takes about 1GB in Postgres versus maybe 50MB in a packfile. Postgres does TOAST and compress large values, but that’s compressing individual objects in isolation, not delta-compressing across versions the way packfiles do, so the storage overhead is real. A delta-compression layer that periodically repacks objects within Postgres, or offloads large blobs to S3 the way LFS does, is a natural next step. For most repositories it still won’t matter since the median repo is small and disk is cheap, and GitHub’s Spokes system made a similar trade-off years ago, storing three full uncompressed copies of every repository across data centres because redundancy and operational simplicity beat storage efficiency even at hundreds of exabytes.
�������ǂނɂ́A�R�����g�̗��p�K���ɓ��ӂ��u�A�C�e�B���f�B�AID�v�����сuITmedia NEWS �A���J�[�f�X�N�}�K�W���v�̓o�^���K�v�ł�
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
Home buyers have more purchasing power when mortgage rates drop.
swap(&arr[i], &arr[largest]);